Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.48548/pubdata-1418
Langanzeige der Metadaten
| Element | Wert |
|---|---|
| Ressourcentyp | Zeitschriftenartikel |
| Titel | Maximal strength measurement: A critical evaluation of common methods - a narrative review |
| DOI | 10.48548/pubdata-1418 |
| Handle | 20.500.14123/1487 |
| Autor*in | Warneke, Konstantin  0000-0003-4964-2867Wagner, Carl-Maximilian 0009-0003-7879-1287Keiner, Michael 0000-0002-1817-1743Hillebrecht, Martin  139928820Schiemann, Stephan 0000-0002-0703-8509 131474332Behm, David George 0000-0002-9406-6056Wallot, Sebastian 0000-0002-3626-3940Wirth, Klaus 0000-0001-9862-4951 |
| Abstract | Measuring maximal strength (MSt) is a very common performance diagnoses, especially in elite and competitive sports. The most popular procedure in test batteries is to test the one repetition maximum (1RM). Since testing maximum dynamic strength is very time consuming, it often suggested to use isometric testing conditions instead. This suggestion is based on the assumption that the high Pearson correlation coefficients of r ≥ 0.7 between isometric and dynamic conditions indicate that both tests would provide similar measures of MSt. However, calculating r provides information about the relationship between two parameters, but does not provide any statement about the agreement or concordance of two testing procedures. Hence, to assess replaceability, the concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) and the Bland-Altman analysis including the mean absolute error (MAE) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) seem to be more appropriate. Therefore, an exemplary model based on r = 0.55 showed ρc = 0.53, A MAE of 413.58 N and a MAPE = 23.6% with a range of −1,000–800 N within 95% Confidence interval (95%CI), while r = 0.7 and 0.92 showed ρc = 0.68 with a MAE = 304.51N/MAPE = 17.4% with a range of −750 N–600 N within a 95% CI and ρc = 0.9 with a MAE = 139.99/MAPE = 7.1% with a range of −200–450 N within a 95% CI, respectively. This model illustrates the limited validity of correlation coefficients to evaluate the replaceability of two testing procedures. Interpretation and classification of ρc, MAE and MAPE seem to depend on expected changes of the measured parameter. A MAPE of about 17% between two testing procedures can be assumed to be intolerably high. |
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter | Maximal Strength; Performance; Testing |
| Jahr der Veröffentlichung in PubData | 2024 |
| Art der Veröffentlichung | Zweitveröffentlichung |
| Publikationsversion | Veröffentlichte Version |
| Datum der Erstveröffentlichung | 2023-02-17 |
| Entstehungskontext | Forschung |
| Fakultät / Abteilung | Fakultät Bildung |
| Anmerkungen | This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg. |
| Verfügbar ab / seit | 2024-11-06T11:00:40Z |
| Archivierende Einrichtung | Medien- und Informationszentrum (Leuphana Universität Lüneburg  02w2y2t16) |
| Veröffentlicht durch | Medien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg |
Informationen zur Erstveröffentlichung
| Element | Wert |
|---|---|
| Ressourcentyp | Zeitschrift |
| Titel des Ressourcentyps | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living |
| Identifier | DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1105201 |
| Publikationsjahr | 2023 |
| Band | 5 |
| Nummer | 1105201 |
| Nummerntyp | Artikel |
| Verlag / Anbieter | Frontiers |
Zugehörige Ressourcen
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Warneke_Maximal_strength_measurement.pdf Lizenz: 
open-access | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.
Ansichten
BibTeX
RIS
Datensatz Exporte
Datacite XML
OpenAIRE4
Zugriffsstatistik
Seitenaufruf(e): 7
Download(s): 7