Eliciting plural nature's values and social networks of grassland restoration actors

Chronological data

Year of publication2025
Date of availability in catalog2025-11-05
Available from / since 2025-11-05

Language of the resource

English

Related external resources

Supplement to DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108721
Kuhn, L., Cebrián-Piqueras, M. Á., Riechers, M., Loos, J., & Martín-López, B. (2025). How methods influence nature's values we find – A comparison of three elicitation methods. Ecological Economics, 238, Artikel 108721
Supplement to Kuhn, L., Cebrián-Piqueras, M. Á., Loos, J., Martín-López, B. (under review). How do relationships articulate decision contexts of social-ecological restoration, submitted to Sustainability Science.

Related PubData resources

Supplement to

Editor

Other contributors

Abstract

This data set contains all the data to reproduce the analyses of the dissertation “Interlinking value-articulating institutions for plural values in restoration”. All data is based on interviews with 39 actors related with extensive grassland management and restoration in the district of Gifhorn, Lower Saxony. Actors were affiliated with various actor groups (i.e., conservation and environmental agencies and non-governmental organization, farmers, ecologists, agricultural consultants, political offices, and land holdings). Interviews served to (i) elicit the plural values that diverse actors associate with grasslands and (ii) to uncover social network structures and dynamics. (i) The elicitation of values was based individual-based elicitation using three commonly used types of methods (i.e., open-ended questions, agreement-based elicitation, and preference-based testing). Four exercises were used (i.e., open-ended questions, list of proposed value statements with a 4-point Likert-Scale, ranking of top 5 statements, and rating top 5 statements by attributing 10 points across them). (ii) Identification of social network structures and dynamics was achieved by snowball sampling on the basis of three different social interactions (i.e., sharing information, co-decision making, and sharing visions and goals). Interviewees were asked to refer to approximately three individuals with whom they engage in each one of the social interactions. These identifications served as candidates for further interviews.

Resource type

Dataset

Kinds of Data

Survey Data
Interview Data

Methods

Interview
Recording
Transcription

Thematic classification

Mensch-Natur-Beziehung

Keywords

Grasland; Restaurierung; Stakeholder; Werte; Bewertung; Ökosystem; Biodiversität; Naturschutz; Soziales Netzwerk; Umweltmanagement; Grasslands; Restoration; Stakeholder; Values; Valuation; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Nature Conservation; Social Network; Environmental Management

Notes

The full interview guide can be accessed in the supplementary materials of the dissertation Chapter 2 or the manuscript (see related publications).

More information

Data Collector

Rightsholder

Time Period of the Collection of the Data

2023-01-04 - 2023-04-25

Time Period of the Creation of the Dataset

Temporal Coverage of the Dataset

Geolocation (Country)

Germany

Geolocation (Region/Location)

Gifhorn, Lower Saxony