Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48548/pubdata-881
Resource typeMaster Thesis
Title(s)Digital identification systems and the right to privacy in the asylum context
Subtitle(s)An analysis of implementations in Germany
DOI10.48548/pubdata-881
Handle20.500.14123/920
CreatorHahn, Helene
Study programmeGovernance and Human Rights
AbstractEstablishing the identity of asylum seekers in the absence of credible documents represents a significant challenge for governments. To support decision-making processes in identity determination and verification procedures, Germany’s Federal Office for Migration and Refugees introduced three digital identification systems under the “Integrated Identity Management - plausibility, data quality and security aspects (IDMS)” programme. Because these algorithmic systems are deployed in highly political settings affecting vulnerable populations on the move, this research investigates how the Federal Office legitimises the policy and use of IDM-S that indicate a new direction of governance driven by so-called “innovative technologies”. In this context, legitimacy - considered a core virtue of just, democratic institutions - is understood as a justificatory concept seen in conjunction with (good) governance and the right to privacy as guaranteed under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The data justice framework is applied to structure the evaluation of state practices. In addition, the qualitative content analysis is used to find patterns in publicly available documents. Expert interviews were carried out to include experiences of affected individuals and to verify identified information provided by the government. The analysis revealed that efforts to legitimise IDM-S included four patterns: referring to the rule of law and national security concerns, non-disclosing delegitimising information and limiting accountability, emphasising performance efficiency and the systems’ high level of innovation, implying objective operations by means of a mathematical-technical approach. The results underscore profound discrepancies between justifications and state practices, outlining severe privacy violations as well as the lack of compliance to qualitative values in governance that pertain to participation, transparency, accountability, impartiality and scientific soundness of state operations.
LanguageEnglish
Date of defense2020-12-31
Year of publication in PubData2021
Publishing typeFirst publication
Date issued2021-03-10
Creation contextStudy
NotesLeuphana University’s International Professional Master’s Programme "Governance and Human Rights".
Granting InstitutionLeuphana Universität Lüneburg
Published byMedien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 

Master_2020_Hahn_Digital.pdf
MD5: 26345ff7f835733a08268fcc9d0939a4
License: 
open-access

3.66 MB

Adobe PDF
View/Open

Items in PubData are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Citation formats
Access statistics

Page view(s): 21

Download(s): 8