Journal ArticleParallel publicationPublished version DOI: 10.48548/pubdata-1433

A Universal Digital Stress Management Intervention for Employees: Randomized Controlled Trial with Health-Economic Evaluation

Chronological data

Date of first publication2024-10-22
Date of publication in PubData 2024-11-08

Language of the resource

English

Related external resources

Variant form of DOI: 10.2196/48481
Freund, J., Smit, F., Lehr, D., Zarski, A. C., Berking, M., Riper, H., Funk, B., Ebert, D. D., Buntrock, C. (2024). A Universal Digital Stress Management Intervention for Employees: Randomized Controlled Trial with Health-Economic Evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, Article e48481.
Published in ISSN: 1438-8871
Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Background: Stress is highly prevalent and known to be a risk factor for a wide range of physical and mental disorders. The effectiveness of digital stress management interventions has been confirmed; however, research on its economic merits is still limited. Objective: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit of a universal digital stress management intervention for employees compared with a waitlist control condition within a time horizon of 6 months. Methods: Recruitment was directed at the German working population. A sample of 396 employees was randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=198) or the waitlist control condition (WLC) group (n=198). The digital stress management intervention included 7 sessions plus 1 booster session, which was offered without therapeutic guidance. Health service use, patient and family expenditures, and productivity losses were self-assessed and used for costing from a societal and an employer’s perspective. Costs were related to symptom-free status (PSS-10 [Perceived Stress Scale] score 2 SDs below the study population baseline mean) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The sampling error was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping. Results: From a societal perspective, the digital intervention was likely to be dominant compared with WLC, with a 56% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €0 per symptom-free person gained. At the same WTP threshold, the digital intervention had a probability of 55% being cost-effective per QALY gained relative to the WLC. This probability increased to 80% at a societal WTP of €20,000 per QALY gained. Taking the employer’s perspective, the digital intervention showed a probability of a positive return on investment of 78%. Conclusions: Digital preventive stress management for employees appears to be cost-effective societally and provides a favorable return on investment for employers.

Keywords

Evaluation; Costs; Effectiveness; Utility; Benefit; Return on Investment; Stress Management

Faculty / department

Notes

This publication was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

More information

DDC

Creation Context

Research