Journal ArticleParallel publicationPublished versionDOI: 10.48548/pubdata-3537

Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression: individual participant data meta-analysis of treatment effects and moderators

Chronological data

Date of first publication2025-05-14
Date of publication in PubData 2026-05-06

Language of the resource

English

Related external resources

Variant form of DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2025.56
Harrer, M., Sprenger, A. A., Illing, S., Adriaanse, M. C., Albert, S. M., Allart, E., Almeida, O. P., Basanovic, J., van Bastelaar, K. M. P., Batterham, P. J., Baumeister, H., Berger, T., Blanco, V., Bø, R., Casten, R. J., Chan, D., Christensen, H., Ciharova, M., Cook, L., … Ebert, D. D. (2025). Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression: individual participant data meta-analysis of treatment effects and moderators. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1–14.
Published in ISSN: 1472-1465
The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

It remains unclear which individuals with subthreshold depression benefit most from psychological intervention, and what long-term effects this has on symptom deterioration, response and remission. To synthesise psychological intervention benefits in adults with subthreshold depression up to 2 years, and explore participant-level effect-modifiers. Randomised trials comparing psychological intervention with inactive control were identified via systematic search. Authors were contacted to obtain individual participant data (IPD), analysed using Bayesian one-stage meta-analysis. Treatment–covariate interactions were added to examine moderators. Hierarchical-additive models were used to explore treatment benefits conditional on baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) values. IPD of 10 671 individuals (50 studies) could be included. We found significant effects on depressive symptom severity up to 12 months (standardised mean-difference [s.m.d.] = −0.48 to −0.27). Effects could not be ascertained up to 24 months (s.m.d. = −0.18). Similar findings emerged for 50% symptom reduction (relative risk = 1.27–2.79), reliable improvement (relative risk = 1.38–3.17), deterioration (relative risk = 0.67–0.54) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.41–2.80). Among participant-level moderators, only initial depression and anxiety severity were highly credible (P > 0.99). Predicted treatment benefits decreased with lower symptom severity but remained minimally important even for very mild symptoms (s.m.d. = −0.33 for PHQ-9 = 5). Psychological intervention reduces the symptom burden in individuals with subthreshold depression up to 1 year, and protects against symptom deterioration. Benefits up to 2 years are less certain. We find strong support for intervention in subthreshold depression, particularly with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10. For very mild symptoms, scalable treatments could be an attractive option.

Keywords

Meta-Analysis; Depressive Disorder; Prevention; Psychological Treatment; Precision Medicine

Faculty / department

More information

DDC

Creation Context

Research