Journal ArticleParallel publicationPublished versionDOI: 10.48548/pubdata-3911

Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under the European Green Deal—regulatory readiness or pressure for companies?

Chronological data

Date of first publication2025-12-13
Date of publication in PubData 2026-07-27

Language of the resource

English

Related external resources

Variant form of DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf188
Sudheshwar, A., Apel, C., Kümmerer, K., Soeteman-Hernández, L. G., Scheper, J. K., Falk, A., Batel, A., Markard, J., Som, C., Wang, Z., & Nowack, B. (2025). Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under the European Green Deal—regulatory readiness or pressure for companies? Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 22(3), 891–909.
Published in ISSN: 1551-3777
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Abstract

The European Green Deal, popular for its “2050 climate neutrality” target, also postulates the “zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment,” supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD’s complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, and the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD’s role in “regulatory readiness,” i.e., proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, i.e., many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the European Union. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD’s “fail early and fail cheap” philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

Keywords

EU Green Deal; Clean Industrial Deal; Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD); Regulatory Readiness; Regulatory Pressure

Leuphana Institution

More information

DDC

Creation Context

Research