Unequal Help: Student–Teacher Relationships and Socioeconomic Inequality in Math Achievement Worldwide
Downloads
Chronological data
Date of first publication2026-05-20
Date of publication in PubData 2026-06-29
Language of the resource
English
Abstract
This study draws on data from 77 and 68 educational systems to conduct a meta-analysis examining the relationship between students’ cultural capital, teacher support, student–teacher relationships, and mathematics achievement. Results show that objectified and institutionalized forms of cultural capital—specifically home possessions ( r = .27, p < .0001), parental occupational status ( r = .17, p < .0001), and parental education ( r = .02 to .03, p < .0001)—are positively associated with student performance, though the strength of these associations varies substantially across national contexts (I2 = 84%–90%). While teacher support (TEACHSUP) and student–teacher relationships (RELATST) do not show significant direct associations with achievement, interaction analyses indicate small but statistically significant moderation patterns. Specifically, teacher support is associated with slight variation in the relationship between home possessions and occupational status and achievement, while student–teacher relationships show similarly modest associations with parental education and home possessions. These effects are small in magnitude ( r = .01 to .04) and should be interpreted with caution. Taken together, the findings do not provide clear evidence of compensatory effects and are consistent with multiple interpretations, including slight variation in existing socioeconomic gradients. The results highlight the continued importance of structural resources as the most consistent predictors of achievement and suggest that the equity potential of relational interventions should be interpreted cautiously.
Keywords
Cultural Capital; Educational Inequality; Student–Teacher Relationship; Teacher Support; Mathematics Achievement; Socioeconomic Status; IPD Meta-Analysis; Relational Pedagogy; Cross-National Education Research
Leuphana Institution
Notes
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence.