Journal ArticleParallel publicationPublished versionDOI: 10.48548/pubdata-4188

Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints

Chronological data

Date of first publication2022-12-18
Date of publication in PubData 2026-08-28

Language of the resource

English

Related external resources

Variant form of DOI : 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831
Smetana, S., Ristic, D., Pleissner, D., Tuomisto, H. L., Parniakov, O., & Heinz, V. (2023). Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, Article 106831.
Published in ISSN : 0921-3449
Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.

Keywords

Meat Substitute; Meat Alternative; Alternative Protein Source; Environmental Impact; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Leuphana Institution

More information

DDC

Creation Context

Research